Legal Opinion

McKitrick v. State, Public Employees Retirement System

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2012No. S-14178PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Chief Justice.

I, INTRODUCTION

A man filed an application for both occupational and nonoceupational disability benefits from the Public Employees Retirement System, claiming disability from both physical and mental conditions. An administrative law judge (ALJ) denied the man's claim, finding that he failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he had a physical or mental disability that presumably permanently prevented him from satisfactorily performing his job. The man appealed and the superior court affirmed the ALJ's determination. On appeal to this court,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Stephens v. ITT/Felec ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lindhag v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. HartigAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Nicolos v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Tesoro Corp. v. State, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
  4. Pacifica Marine, Inc. v. Solomon Gold, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Vonder Haar v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API