Lindhag v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board rejected Teresa Lindhag’s request for benefits for certain medical problems allegedly caused by toxic exposures suffered while working in a new state office building. Ms. Lindhag appeals two of the board’s orders: the first denied benefits to Lindhag and the second denied Lindhag’s petition for rehearing and modification based on newly discovered medical evidence. Because the first order is supported by substantial evidence, and because the second order correctly concluded that Lindhag failed to allege a mistake…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Stephens v. ITT/Felec ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Hodges v. Alaska Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. University of Alaska, FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Pietro v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- McKitrick v. State, Public Employees Retirement SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Jurgens v. City of North PoleAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Nicolos v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.