Tesoro Corp. v. State, Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Senior Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Tesoro Corporation challenges income taxes assessed against it by the Alaska Department of Revenue (DOR) for 1994 through 1998. DOR calculated Tesoro's Alaska income by applying a three-factor apportionment formula to Tesoro's worldwide income, including that of its non-Alaskan subsidiaries. Tesoro challenged DOR's apportionment in a trial before an administrative law judge, who ruled that Tesoro was a unitary business that could be subject to formula apportionment, and that DOR could permissibly assess penalties against Tesoro. Tesoro appealed…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes of Vt.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- State Tax Assessor v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- PADRM Gold Mine, LLC v. Perkumpulan Investor Crisis Center Dressel - WBGAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Ross v. Alaska State Comm'n for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Harry Ross v. State of Alaska Human Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.