Legal Opinion
Bradford Novelty Co. v. Manheim
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 14, 1957PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit arising out of an alleged patent infringement. One of the defendants, Samuel Eppy & Co., Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Eppy”, has moved to dismiss the complaint against him on grounds of improper venue.
The complaint charges Eppy and his distributor, one Magnus M. Manheim, with infringing plaintiff’s patent for Christmas tree ornaments by manufacturing and selling within the Southern District and elsewhere in the United States Christmas ornaments allegedly modeled after and copied from plaintiff’s patented product. A further cause of action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- PKWare, Inc. v. MeadeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Mastantuono v. Jacobsen Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Crosfield Hastech, Inc. v. Harris Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1987
- Koratron Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Wichita Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Landmark Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.