Legal Opinion

Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1955No. 5072PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This is an action for patent infringement brought by Ruth against the Eagle-Pieher Company in the District of Col*573orado. Eagle-Picher imposed a motion to dismiss on the ground that while it is authorized to do, business in the State of Colorado, it is a corporation organized under the laws of Ohio and had committed no acts of patent infringément within the District of Colorado. The trial court sustained the motion. Ruth has appealed.

28 U.S.C.A. § 109, prior to the 1948 revision of the Judicial Code, Act of June 25, 1948, 62 Stat. 869, in part read as follows:

“In suits…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Catherine Bedell, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API