Legal Opinion

Van Valkenburg v. J.S.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2006No. 20060156PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] J.S. appeals the district court’s treatment order continuing his hospitalization in the North Dakota State Hospital for one year. He argues the district court erred by not ordering a less restrictive alternative treatment. Holding that the district court did not err, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] J.S., a 69-year-old male, has been a State Hospital patient since 1989. He is diagnosed with chronic paranoid schizophrenia, tardive dyskinesia, Type II diabetes, hypertension, and arthritis. He receives injections of Risperidone Consta, an anti-psychotic medication, for his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Castillo v. D.Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Williams v. D.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Interest of A.I.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Interest of A.I.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Interest of TeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pryatel v. T.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re JsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API