Legal Opinion

Interest of Te

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2007No. 20070278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

740 N.W.2d 100 (2007)

2007 ND 166

Interest of T.E.

William PRYATEL, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee

v.

T.E., Respondent and Appellant.

No. 20070278.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

October 16, 2007.

Kenneth L. Dalsted (argued), Special Assistant Attorney General, and Jodi A. Bass (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Jamestown, N.D., for petitioner and appellee.

Thomas E. Merrick, Jamestown, N.D., for respondent and appellant.

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] T.E. appeals from a district court order allowing the North Dakota State Hospital to treat him…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McDowell v. GillieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Doyle Ex Rel. Doyle v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TasslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API