Legal Opinion

Williams v. D.P.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2001No. 20010285PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] D.P. appeals from an involuntary treatment order committing him to the North Dakota State Hospital for ninety days. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a hearing on whether a less restrictive alternative treatment is appropriate.

I

[¶ 2] On October 19,. 2001, a treatment hearing was held in the district court to decide whether D.P. should be committed to the North Dakota State Hospital for treatment. The district court concluded D.P. is a person requiring treatment. The district court found D.P. is mentally ill and suffers from delusions that law…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. M.K. v. J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Haider v. H.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Arevalo v. M.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Interest of PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Castillo v. D.Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Van Valkenburg v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Miller v. B.D.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. North Dakota State Hospital v. C.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API