Williams v. D.P.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] D.P. appeals from an involuntary treatment order committing him to the North Dakota State Hospital for ninety days. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a hearing on whether a less restrictive alternative treatment is appropriate.
I
[¶ 2] On October 19,. 2001, a treatment hearing was held in the district court to decide whether D.P. should be committed to the North Dakota State Hospital for treatment. The district court concluded D.P. is a person requiring treatment. The district court found D.P. is mentally ill and suffers from delusions that law…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- M.K. v. J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Haider v. H.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Arevalo v. M.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Interest of PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Castillo v. D.Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Van Valkenburg v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Miller v. B.D.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- North Dakota State Hospital v. C.A.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.