Legal Opinion

Castillo v. D.Z.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2002No. 20020190PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] D.Z. appealed, pro se, from July 1, 2002 orders of the trial court involuntarily committing D.Z. to the North Dakota State Hospital and authorizing forced medication upon him. We hold the trial court did not err in finding that D.Z. is a mentally ill person in need of treatment and that alternative treatment to involuntary commitment at the state hospital is not appropriate. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] D.Z. was admitted to the state hospital in Jamestown on May 31, 2002 on an emergency basis, after he asked F.B.I. personnel to investigate his neighbors for conspiring…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. M.K. v. J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Williams v. D.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Pryatel v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Haider v. H.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Pryatel v. M.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Mark V.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Johnson v. BronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. MeadorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API