Legal Opinion

Pryatel v. T.E.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2007No. 20070278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] T.E. appeals from a district court order allowing the North Dakota State Hospital to treat him involuntarily with medication until November 20, 2007. We reject T.E.’s argument that the district court’s forced medication order should be reversed because a State Hospital patient cannot be subjected to more than one 90-day medication order under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-18.1(3). We further conclude the court’s finding that T.E. refused medication, one of the prerequisites for issuance of a forced medication order under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-18.1(l)(a)(2), is not clearly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McDowell v. GillieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Doyle Ex Rel. Doyle v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. North Dakota State Hospital v. D.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Interest of TeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API