Love v. Anchor Raisin Vineyard Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San' Francisco; John Hunt, Judge. Action by Louisa P. Love against the Anchor Raisin Vineyard Company, a corporation. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
This is an action to recover upon a promissory note, made by the corporation defendant August 4, 1892, for $6,261.29, payable one day after date to the order of John Conly, in gold coin, with interest at eight per cent per annum, and indorsed by the payee thereof to plaintiff. Plaintiff had a verdict for $5,532.38, upon which verdict judgment was entered. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The evidence embodied in the statement on motion for a new trial shows that the note was indorsed to the plaintiff herein after maturity,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sukeforth v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Spotts v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Adams v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Eddelbuttel v. DurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Burnett v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Watt v. German Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1917
- N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co. v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918