N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co. v. Rush
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The action is to foreclose a lien claimed by the plaintiff upon the property of T. J. Rush for materials furnished to W. A. Merrick, who was a subcontractor for a plumbing and heating plant installed in an apartment house erected by the Pacific States Investment Company, as original contractor, for T. J. Rush, the owner. The plaintiff is a corporation.
The plaintiff’s claim for the materials amounted to $6,261.95. The court allowed it only $461.95. It is of this reduction that the plaintiff complains. During the progress of the work on Merrick’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Love v. Anchor Raisin Vineyard Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Hobbs v. Georgia Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926