Legal Opinion

N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co. v. Rush

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1918No. L. A. No. 4475. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

The action is to foreclose a lien claimed by the plaintiff upon the property of T. J. Rush for materials furnished to W. A. Merrick, who was a subcontractor for a plumbing and heating plant installed in an apartment house erected by the Pacific States Investment Company, as original contractor, for T. J. Rush, the owner. The plaintiff is a corporation.

The plaintiff’s claim for the materials amounted to $6,261.95. The court allowed it only $461.95. It is of this reduction that the plaintiff complains. During the progress of the work on Merrick’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Love v. Anchor Raisin Vineyard Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hobbs v. Georgia Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API