Legal Opinion

Colton v. Foulkes

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1951PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.

In the complaint in each action plaintiff alleged:

That the defendant employer had contracted with plaintiff to make certain repairs of the roof and porch railing on his residence and to furnish all necessary materials and labor for said repairs and do all work in a good and workmanshiplike manner, with due care and skill, and that thereby it became necessary for the employer to replace and repair the porch railing; that in replacing the railing defendants in disregard of the employer’s duty to securely fasten the same and use suitable and safe materials, used material and posts which were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Mobile Life Insurance v. RandallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Hamus v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hoeverman v. FeldmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Inman v. Binghamton Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Dow v. Holly Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Brooks v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Landwehr v. Citizens Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API