Legal Opinion
Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Schachner
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1988PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Theodore A. Kelly, J.
Petitioner brings this proceeding to vacate an arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his authority. Since petitioner has also questioned the constitutionality of section 198-a of the General Business Law (the Lemon Law), the Attorney-General of the State of New York is granted leave to intervene as an additional party respondent. Respondent Joseph Schachner cross-moves for a change of venue from Rockland County to Nassau County, to confirm the award, and for attorney’s fees.
On August 10, 1984, a 1984 Dodge, manufactured by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Laiosa v. Camelot AMC/Jeep, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Hynson & American Motors Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In re the Arbitration between Subaru of America & McKelveyNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- General Motors Corp. v. FischerNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Chrysler Motors Corp. v. SchachnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.