Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Subaru of America & McKelvey
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*42OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard C. Wesley, J.
Subaru of America (hereinafter Subaru) brings the instant application to vacate an arbitrator’s award, pursuant to General Business Law § 198-a, commonly referred to as the New Car Lemon Law.
Sherri McKelvey (hereinafter McKelvey) purchased a Subaru automobile in September of 1986. On or about November 2, 1987, McKelvey filed with the American Arbitration Association (AAA) a "Lemon Law Controversy”. Following a hearing, the arbitrator awarded McKelvey a refund of her purchase price, license costs, registration, filing fees and State sales tax. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. KeeffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Korein v. RabinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- In re the Arbitration between Torano & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Chrysler Motors Corp. v. SchachnerNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Conlan v. General Motors Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMCSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- American Motors Sales Corp. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Lyeth v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
- DeVries v. Pitts Pontiac GMC-Trucks, Inc.Rochester City Court · 1989
- American Motors Sales Corp. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.