General Motors Corp. v. Fischer
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert W. Coutant, J.
Prior to the commencement of this CPLR article 75 proceeding, respondent, Deborah Fischer, sought arbitration under *244General Business Law § 198-a (Lemon Law). After the arbitrator ruled in her favor, petitioner commenced this proceeding to vacate that award. This court ruled in favor of the respondent and confirmed the arbitrator’s award by written decision dated May 7, 1988. Respondent now moves for an award of attorney’s fees.
The Lemon Law provides in relevant part that "[a] court may award reasonable attorney’s fees to a prevailing plaintiff.”…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chrysler Motors Corp. v. SchachnerNew York Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Hynson & American Motors Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- General Motors Corp. v. SmallerNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Lyeth v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
- Safari Motor Coaches, Inc. v. CorwinNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- DeVries v. Pitts Pontiac GMC-Trucks, Inc.Rochester City Court · 1989