In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lazer, J. P.
This appeal confronts us with an opportunity to attempt definition of the standard to be applied when reviewing a compulsory arbitration award which has been infected by *443error of law.1 Three recent Court of Appeals determinations have set awry the conventional method of dealing with such questions (see Matter of Garcia v Federal Ins. Co., 46 NY2d 1040; Matter of Furstenberg [Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.], 49 NY2d 757; cf. Matter of Levine v Zurich Amer. Ins. Co., 49 NY2d 907) while failing to clearly articulate guidelines for the future. Until definitive precepts do…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Robert J. Lyeth v. Chrysler Corporation, Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Dahn v. LuchsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Celona v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Chrysler Motors Corp. v. SchachnerNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Nyack Hospital v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.