Legal Opinion
Muzzy v. Chevrolet Div., GMC
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 1, 1989No. 87-272PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Terry and Robert Muzzy (appellees) purchased a new Chevrolet from an authorized General Motors Corporation dealer in February, 1985. After numerous repair attempts, ap-pellees sought statutory remedies under the New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Act (Act), 9 V.S.A. §§ 4170-4181. The Vermont Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board (Board), created to hear consumer complaints arising under the statute, found appellees *181entitled to relief. The Board ordered General Motors Corporation (GM) to refund a portion of the purchase price and other expenses. GM appealed to the Washington Superior Court, which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,679 in the Matter of the Arbitration Between Herbert Sobel, and Hertz, Warner & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In Re Robinson/Keir PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Springfield Teachers Ass'n v. Springfield School DirectorsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Vermont Built, Inc. v. KrolickSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Houston v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.