Legal Opinion

Middlesex County National Bank v. Redd Auto Sales, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 5, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

Although described in the writ as an action of contract or tort, this is in essence an action of tort for deceit to recover for false representations alleged to have been made by the defendant. The judge made findings of fact and found for the plaintiff. The Appellate Division, on report, vacated the finding and ordered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed.

Findings of the judge included the following. The plaintiff is a bank. The defendant was in the business of selling new and used automobiles. The plaintiff in the regular course of its business had financed customers of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Cauman v. BiggarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Cucchiara v. SettinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brock & Davis Co., Inc. v. Charleston Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1977
  2. Goebel v. Schmid Bros., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
  3. Laker v. FreidDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API