Legal Opinion

Cucchiara v. Settino

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In this action for assault and battery, the judge found for the plaintiff. The answer alleges that the defendant acted in self defence. The only exception relates to the admission of an answer to one question asked in cross-examination of the defendant. The meager bill of exceptions contains certain questions and answers in the defendant’s cross-examination and no other evidence.

The entire course of the cross-examination, so far as contained in the record, was as follows: The defendant, when asked if he had a full sized hand, answered, “196 pounds,” and denied that it would make two of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Massachusetts Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. RivetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Pendleton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Freedman v. LipmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Brennan v. BongiornoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Middlesex County National Bank v. Redd Auto Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API