Legal Opinion

Brock & Davis Co., Inc. v. Charleston Nat. Bank

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided December 20, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-0608 CHPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COPENHAVER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Brock and Davis Company, Inc., brings this action against defendant, The Charleston National Bank, claiming, inter alia, that the Bank fraudulently misrepresented the financial situation of one of its customers, Snowshoe Company, thereby inducing Brock and Davis to advance credit in the form of goods and services to Snowshoe and that, as a result, the Bank was directly benefitted and Brock and Davis was damaged in excess of four hundred thousand dollars. Jurisdiction is based on diversity and amount in controversy. The case is currently…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Morgan v. Grace Hospital, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Thompson v. Whitaker Iron Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Tynes v. ShoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Midlantic National Bank North, N.A. v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. (In Re Mayo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1990
  2. Ridgeway Coal Co., Inc. v. FMC Corp.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1985
  3. National Equipment & Mold Corp. v. Metropolitan Bank of Lima (In Re National Equipment & Mold Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1986
  4. Baker v. Wheat First SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1986
  5. Dostert v. Washington Post Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API