Cauman v. Biggar
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
These two actions were tried together. There was evidence that the plaintiff was induced to enter into a written lease of real estate to the Merchant Tailors’ Manufacturing Company, a Massachusetts corporation, hereinafter called the Company, as a result of fraudulent *92representations made by the defendant Walter Biggar, personally, and as agent of the other defendant. The misrepresentations were that the stock of the company to the extent of $50,000 had been subscribed for and $20,000 paid in in cash, when in fact, as the defendant Biggar knew, but $6,600 had been subscribed and only $4,400…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deane v. CaldwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Towle v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Huntress v. BlodgettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Hunnewell v. DuxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barrett Associates, Inc. v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Weiner v. LowensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HosmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- Goebel v. Schmid Bros., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Laker v. FreidDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.