Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Bankers Life & Casualty Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1970No. 11924PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

Plaintiff, the designated beneficiary, initiated this action to recover the balance due on a decreasing term rider in an insurance policy issued on the life of her husband, Preston J. Burnham, deceased. The defendant insurance company alleged that the policy was issued January 1, 1962, and lapsed upon failure to pay premiums on April 1, 1967. Thereafter, the policy was reinstated on July 21, 1967, pursuant to an application by the insured, wherein there was contained a provision that the applicant and company agreed that the reinstatement of the policy should be contestable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gressler v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gressler v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Wootton v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Marks v. Continental Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Occidental Life Insurance Company of California v. Anne Dion SobieskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carolyn S. Volis v. Puritan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  2. Chavis v. Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Hardy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Moore v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Fuller v. Director of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API