Legal Opinion
Gressler v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1945No. 6775PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
Plaintiffs, the sole beneficiaries under the terms of an insurance contract, bring'this action to recover the benefits provided for in said contract issued by the defendant New York Life Insurance Company upon the life of one Herbert E. Gressler. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, defendant New York Life Insurance Company appeals.
The facts, having been presented by written stipulation, are not in dispute. In 1936 at Salt Lake City, Utah, defendant New York Life Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as the Company, issued a policy of life insurance upon the life of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- MacDonald v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LovejoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PettidArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Douglass v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carolyn S. Volis v. Puritan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- MacHinery Center, Inc. And the Continental Bank and Trust Company v. Anchor National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Burnham v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Gressler v. New York Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1945
- Anaconda Minerals Co. v. Stoller Chemical Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.