Legal Opinion

Marks v. Continental Casualty Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1967No. 10656PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

The plaintiff, Ruth Marks, sued for the cost of hospitalization and medical expenses for an operation on her back, claiming coverage by defendant, Continental Casualty Company. Neither the writing of the coverage, nor the payment of premium, in May, 1963, is disputed. Defendant based its refusal to pay on two grounds: (1) that plaintiff made misrepresentations in applying for the insurance; and (2) that the operation was. to correct a condition which existed prior to the insurance coverage. Upon a trial to the court it made findings against the defendant on both issues…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Theros v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wootton v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. GrowUtah Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Burnham v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Berger v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fuller v. Director of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kramer v. State Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API