Legal Opinion
Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 1991No. C5-91-300PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction and its denial of appellant’s motion to amend the findings of fact. We affirm and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Bellboy Seafood Corporation (Bellboy) is a Minnesota-based supplier of fish and other seafood products. Appellant Quality Fish (Quality) is a New York wholesaler/distributor of fish products. North American Shellfish is a seafood company also located in New York. Florida-based Kent Trading is a broker that arranges purchases of seafood for its clients.
Bellboy alleged in its complaint that Kent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992