Legal Opinion

Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1991No. C5-91-300Published

1Opinion of the Court

473 N.W.2d 384 (1991)

BELLBOY SEAFOOD CORPORATION, Respondent,

v.

KENT TRADING CORP., d/b/a Al Kent Sales, Defendant,

Quality Fish, Appellant.

No. C5-91-300.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 13, 1991.

Review Granted September 25, 1991.

Steven M. Bell, Eden Prairie, for respondent.

Carolyn J. Trevis, Krause & Rollins, Chartered, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and HUSPENI and SCHUMACHER, JJ.

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction and its denial of appellant's motion to amend the findings of fact. We affirm…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API