Legal Opinion
Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1992No. C5-91-300PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
We granted the petition of Quality Fish, a New York corporation, to review a split decision of the court of appeals, the majority of the panel having affirmed the trial court’s denial of Quality’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdictions. Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp., 473 N.W.2d 384 (Minn.Ct.App.1991). We reverse.
The only issue before this court is whether the contacts between Quality Fish and the State of Minnesota are sufficient to support the exercise of personal jurisdiction over this nonresident defendant. We conclude that they are not. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Marshall Egg Transport Co. v. Bender-Goodman Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Leoni v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- TRWL Financial Establishment v. Select International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Viracon, Inc. v. J & L Curtain Wall LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Quality Pork International v. Rupari Food Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Quality Pork International v. Rupari Food Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004