Legal Opinion
Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1992No. C5-91-300Published
1Opinion of the Court
484 N.W.2d 796 (1992)
BELLBOY SEAFOOD CORPORATION, Respondent,
v.
KENT TRADING CORP. d/b/a Al Kent Sales, Defendant,
Quality Fish, petitioner, Appellant.
No. C5-91-300.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 22, 1992.
Carolyn J. Trevis, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Steven M. Bell, Eden Prairie, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
We granted the petition of Quality Fish, a New York corporation, to review a split decision of the court of appeals, the majority of the panel having affirmed the trial court's denial of Quality's motion to dismiss for lack of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Dent-Air, Inc. v. Beech Mountain Air Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.