Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.

I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion mistakenly asserts that it would be unfair to sue appellant, Quality Fish, in Minnesota because it maintains no physical presence here. This assertion is conspicuously contrary to our own and the United States Supreme Court’s in personam jurisdiction precedents. Moreover, the majority offhandedly dismisses the lower courts’ de--cisions without any discussion of or regard for the test the majority allegedly applied to conclude that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the nonresident appellant in this case. In my opinion, application of…