Legal Opinion

City Nat. Bank of Lawton, Okl. v. Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1927No. 7116PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

On March 24, 1921, appellee, Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Company, sued George E. Young, of Lawton, Okl., on his two notes for $1,900 each, payable to appellee at Dallas, Tex., and on the same day filed its affidavit and bond for a writ of garnishment before judgment to issue to appellant Liverpool & London & Globe'Insurance Company, Limited, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in Texas, alleging that garnishee was indebted to Young. The writ was legally served on March 29, 1921, at Dallas, Tex., and on May 17, 1921, garnishee answered that it was not indebted to George E. Young, of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Harris v. SchlinkeTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kelly v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Armour Fertilizer Works v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Home Improvement Loan Co. v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Trail v. Maphis & DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Bowen v. First State Bank of FateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API