Legal Opinion

Bowen v. First State Bank of Fate

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1931No. 3982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. X

(after stating the case as above).

While confusion has existed in the decisions of courts in this state as to the rule applicable in determining questions like the one here presented, it seems to be now settled, Benson v. Fulmore (Tex. Com. App.) 269 S. W. 71; City Nat. Bank v. Sales Co. [Tex. Civ. App.] 297 S. W. 563; Davisson v. Eastland County [Tex. Civ. App.] 6 S.W.(2d) 782; Long v. Long [Tex. Civ. App.] 269 S. W. 207, in harmony with the holdings in other jurisdictions, 1 C. J. 45, that “the pendency of a prior action or suit for the same cause, between the same parties, in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benson v. FulmoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Dizon v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. City Nat. Bank of Lawton, Okl. v. Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Merrell v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Peurifoy v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API