Legal Opinion
Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided May 23, 1928No. 912-4985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPÉER, J.
The following is taken from the statement Of the case as made by Justice Blair for the Court of Civil Appeals:
“On March 24, 1921, appellee, Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Company, sued George E. Young, of Lawton, Okl., on his two notes for $1,900 each, payable to appellee at Dallas, Tex., and on the same day filed its affidavit and bond for a writ of garnishment before judgment to issue to appellant Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company, Limited, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in Texas, alleging that garnishee was indebted to Young. The writ was legally served on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Grover & Baker Sewing MacHine Co. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hunt v. BP Exploration Co.(Libya) Ltd.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- Thompson v. Fulton Bag & Cotton MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Schacht v. SchachtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Ross v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Lummus Cotton Gin Sales Co. v. ConnerlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.