Legal Opinion

Trail v. Maphis & Day

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1930No. 7404PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The parties are designated appellant and appellee. Appellee, as landlord, caused a distress warrant for rents to issue against appellant, Trail, and Grady Emerson, and levied upon certain cold drink furniture and fixtures belonging to Emerson, and located in a building which appellee had rented to him. The property was left in the possession of appellant, Trail, upon his executing a replevy bond with J. A. Graves and Ross Huffmaster as sureties. The distress warrant was returned to the county court because of the amount involved. Appellee then filed a petition, seeking to recover $285 for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buzar v. First National Bank of GreenvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Camden Fire Ins. Co. v. YarbroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. American Type Founders Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. American Type Founders' Co. v. NicholsTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. H. R. E., B. & B. Ass'n v. CochranTexas Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Windham v. Citizens Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Conoco, Inc. v. Amarillo National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API