Legal Opinion
Armour Fertilizer Works v. Sanders
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1933No. 6796PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Two insurance corporations of Connecticut owed W. D. Sanders, a citizen of Texas, *903insurance money for loss by fire of property in Texas which had constituted part of his homestead. They were served in Illinois as garnishees on proceedings in foreign attachment brought there by Armour Fertilizer Works, a corporation of Illinois, against Sanders on notes held against him which contained a waiver of all homestead and exemption rights. The garnishees by amended answers admitted liability, but set up that the money was claimed by Sanders to be his homestead and not liable to…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cramer v. Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. Harvey Rubenstein, Bernard C. Sherman, Claimant-Appellant v. City National Bank, Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. HaackDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
- Loew's, Inc. v. Hoyt Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Prudential Insurance Company of America v. ShawverDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.