Legal Opinion

State v. Taniguchi

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1995No. 94-1164PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The issue certified for our review is “[wjhether a defendant’s acquittal on a prior charge, which served as the basis for charges against the defendant for having a weapon while under indictment, thereafter precludes a conviction on the weapon disability charges.”

Appellee’s disability from having a weapon was imposed by R.C. 2923.13, which provides:

“(A) Unless relieved from disability as provided in section 2923.14 of the Revised Code, no person shall knowingly * * * have * * * any firearm * * * if any of the following apply:

* *

*156“(2) Such person is under indictment for * * * any felony of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bernardini v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. WaddellOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Mosher v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Zumwalde v. Madeira & Indian Hill Joint Fire DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HiattOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. Carnes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. Wheatley, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Hocking County2018
  5. State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API