Legal Opinion

State v. Carnes (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2018No. 2017-0087PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeGenaro, J.

*528 {¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal, we consider whether using a prior juvenile adjudication of delinquency for the commission of an offense that would have been felonious assault if it had been committed by an adult as an element of the offense of having a weapon under disability as set forth in R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) violates due process. We conclude that it does not, and *140 we affirm the judgment of the First District Court of Appeals.

Relevant Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} Appellant, Anthony Carnes, was indicted by a grand jury in 2013 on one count of having a weapon while under a disability…

Also in this document: Dissent · O'Connor; Dissent · O'Connor.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. GatewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. PhilpottsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API