State v. Waddell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
'In this case we are asked to determine whether a court must consider an accused’s statement before accepting a no contest plea to *631a misdemeanor offense. We hold R.C. 2937.07 requires that a court need only consider the explanation of circumstances by the state before it passes judgment. While a court may certainly consider a statement from the accused, it is not required to do so.
To decide this issue, we- are asked to construe R.C. 2937.07. R.C. 2937.07 contains two paragraphs — the first dealing with the procedure required by the court before accepting a guilty…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Hakim v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Chope v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by38 opinions
- State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. HiattOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.