Legal Opinion

State v. Waddell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1995No. 93-265PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

'In this case we are asked to determine whether a court must consider an accused’s statement before accepting a no contest plea to *631a misdemeanor offense. We hold R.C. 2937.07 requires that a court need only consider the explanation of circumstances by the state before it passes judgment. While a court may certainly consider a statement from the accused, it is not required to do so.

To decide this issue, we- are asked to construe R.C. 2937.07. R.C. 2937.07 contains two paragraphs — the first dealing with the procedure required by the court before accepting a guilty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hakim v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Chope v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. HiattOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API