Legal Opinion

State v. Ortega

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 21, 2006No. 55666-5-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 Reynaldo Ortega appeals his three convictions for felony violation of a protection order. Such violations are felonies when the defendant has two prior convictions for violating protection orders. Ortega contends that his convictions cannot be felonies because the jury was told not to consider his prior convictions for any purpose other than to evaluate his credibility. The limiting instruction did not, however, prevent the jury from concluding that the prior convictions existed. We affirm the felony convictions.

FACTS

¶2 Mia Costello, age 18, began dating Ortega in the summer of 2004.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. Avendano-LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re the Detention of DuncanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State Of Washington v. Richard Bruce, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington v. Sergio Stuardo MonroyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Tony MonroeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API