Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2019No. 96325-8PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

*693 ¶1 Brendan Reidy Taylor was charged with felony violation of a no-contact order. Before trial, Taylor offered to stipulate that a domestic violence no-contact order was in place and that he knew of the order. The trial court rejected Taylor's offered stipulation and admitted the no-contact order into evidence at trial. The trial court reasoned that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Old Chief v. United States , 1 which requires a trial court to accept a defendant's offered stipulation to the fact of a prior felony conviction in a felon-in-possession prosecution, did not apply to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. RamirezWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Thanh Pham NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. State Of Washington, V. Brandon SullivanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  3. In re Dependency of N.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State Of Washington v. Abdijabar Ahmed MohamedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State Of Washington v. Armel M. LumemboCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API