Legal Opinion

State v. Avendano-Lopez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 2, 1995No. 17683-1-IIPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

A jury found Ignacio Avendano-Lopez guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. We hold that the prosecutor improperly asked AvendanoLopez on cross-examination whether he had "on occasion sold heroin,” and improperly concluded her cross-examination by asking Avendano-Lopez, "You are not legal in this country, are you?” Avendano-Lopez did not "open the door” to these questions by testifying that he had recently been released from jail, was born in Mexico, and was raised in Mexico and Texas. Nonetheless, holding that it is unlikely that the misconduct affected the verdict, we affirm.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. Farr-LenziniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API