Legal Opinion
Kuvedina, LLC v. Cognizant Technology Solutions
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 21, 2013No. Case No. 2:12-cv-342PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
In this diversity action, Plaintiff Kuvedina, LLC (“Kuvedina”) seeks damages arising from disputes in its business relationship with Defendant Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation (“Cognizant”) and alleged fraud perpetrated by Defendants Mahesh Kashyap (“Kashyap”) and Crystalsoft, Inc. (“Crystalsoft”). Kashyap and Crystalsoft move to dismiss Kuvedina’s claims, ECF No. 27. Separately, Cognizant moves to dismiss the claims against it or, in the alternative, to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), ECF No. 28. For the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Horter Investment Management, LLC v. CutterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
- Dana Ltd. v. Aon Consulting, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Hanneman Family Funeral Homes & Crematorium v. OriansOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Advance Wire Forming, Inc. v. SteinDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Andre Williams v. USAA/Garrison Property and CasualtyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.