Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald N. Fern

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 17, 1983No. 81-6235PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, Senior Circuit Judge:

Fern appeals his jury conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1001 1 by making a materially false statement to an Internal Revenue Service Tax Auditor. 2 He asserts that § 1001 is inapplicable within the parameters of this case; that it was error for the Court to hold that his statement was material; that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction; and that Fern was never identified as the person who made the false statement. We disagree and affirm.

When the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter BacanovicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. George Vernon HansenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. EdmonsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Rafael CorsinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API