Legal Opinion

United States v. Edmonson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1986No. Nos. 85-3029, 85-7337, 85-3104 to 85-3108 and 85-7500PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

We have consolidated these cases, coming to us from the decisions of two district judges of the Eastern District of Washington, as they present the same question of law. The question we consider is the interrelationship of Sections 495 and 510 of Title 18, United States Code.

The predecessor of Section 495 was enacted in 1823. It punishes as a felony the forgery and alteration of specified documents “or other writing” for the purpose of defrauding the United States. The forgery of Treasury check endorsements is not specifically denounced in Section 495 but, at least…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. United States v. Darnell GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. John Horak, and United States of America v. John HorakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. People v. StatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. United States v. Charles ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. State v. SchubertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API