People v. Rose
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
By an information filed in the superior court of the county of Sacramento on the thirty-first day of March, 1919, defendant, William Rose, and one Nicholas Kinominas (whose name appeared later to be Kintominas) were charged with having obtained money by false pretenses from one Peter Hassouros (whose name also appears in the record as Hassouras). The defendant, Rose, had a separate trial, was convicted by a jury, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison. He prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The prosecuting…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LawlorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- People v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. BonneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. WeirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. MestasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.