Carmichael v. Riley
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus to compel the State Controller to draw his warrant in payment of a claim allowed by the State Reclamation Board. Writ granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is an original application for a writ of mandamus directing respondent to draw his warrant for the sum of five thousand dollars in payment of petitioner’s claim against the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, allowed by the state reclamation board and approved by the state board of control.
October 23, 1919, the reclamation board adopted “Plans and Estimates of Cost for Feather River Project and Assessment Number Seven. ’ ’ These plans provided for the acquisition of rights of way and the construction of a levee through petitioner’s and other lands and for the removal from the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Mcconoughey v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Mott v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Cope v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925