Schick Manufacturing, Inc. v. Gillette Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DKT. NO. 7], MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND [DKT. NO. 103], and VARIOUS MOTIONS IN LIMINE [DKT. NOS. 104, 105, and 111]
HALL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Schick Manufacturing Company (“Schick”), seeks a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant, The Gillette Company (“Gillette”), from making certain claims about its M3 Power razor system (“M3 Power”). Schick contends that Gillette has made various false claims in violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUT-PA”), Conn.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tom Doherty Associates, Inc. D/B/A Tor Books v. Saban Entertainment, Inc. And Saban International N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- The Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Tough Traveler, Ltd. v. Outbound Products, Taymor Industries, Ltd., and Taymor Industries, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., v. the Clorox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Ultreo, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Chobani, LLC v. Dannon Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- General Mills, Inc. v. Chobani, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Rexall Sundown, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- In re M3 Power Razor System Marketing & Sales Practice LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.