Legal Opinion
Rexall Sundown, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 10, 2009No. 07-CV-3397 (JFB)(ETB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:
Plaintiff Rexall Sundown, Inc. (hereinafter, “Rexall” or “plaintiff’) brings this action against Perrigo Company (hereinafter, “Perrigo” or “defendant”), claiming violations of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. and state law. Perrigo brings counterclaims against Rexall also claiming violations of the Lanham Act.
Rexall is the manufacturer of Osteo Bi-Flex products, which is a brand of nutritional supplement for joint care containing the ingredients Glucosamine and Chondroitin. Rexall alleges that Perrigo, a competitor that…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. v. Wintermantel Enters., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Merck Eprova AG v. Gnosis S.p.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Pom Wonderful LLC v. Organic Juice USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Beyond79, LLC -v- Express Gold Cash, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Express Gold Cash, Inc. v. Beyond79, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.