Legal Opinion
Stanbury v. Larsen
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1990No. 90-48, 90-49PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.
Samuel J. Stanbury sued Raymond B. Larsen on two unpaid promissory notes. The district court ruled for Larsen on one note and entered judgment in Stanbury’s favor on the other. Stanbury appealed the district court’s dismissal of his suit on the first note by assertion of district court error in not tolling the Wyoming statute of limitations. Larsen filed a cross-appeal, and asserts the district court erred in finding that the cause of action on the second note arose in Wyoming, precluding application of a shorter California statute of limitations, with an additional…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Arthur Chambless and Mildred H. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Greenwood v. WierdsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Cantonwine v. FehlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- McLain v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.