United States v. Caputo
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Presently before this Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment. (R. 24-1, Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss.) Defendants’ motion to dismiss raises four arguments: (1) the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) regulatory scheme violates the Due Process Clause because it is too ambiguous to afford proper notice of prohibited conduct; (2) the conspiracy count is duplicitous; (3) FDA prohibitions on manufacturer promotion of off-label uses violates the First Amendment; and (4) the false-statement count is based on fundamentally ambiguous…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Thompson v. Western States Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. WurzbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. James P. HickokCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Epogen & Aranesp Offlabel Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- In Re Actimmune Marketing LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- United States v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States v. CaroniaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- United States v. CaputoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.